Coming from a Catholic School background, I'm new to the world of wear whatever you want to school. The 2007-2008 D41 handbook states as part of the dress code:
Students may not wear clothing that is excessively revealing, such as micro-miniskirts, short shorts, transparent apparel, tank tops, loose fitting, one-shoulder or off-shoulder tops and low-cut halter-tops. Clothing should cover the torso. Skirts/shorts must be at or near mid-thigh. No underwear should be showing.
My soon to be Kindergartener is a big fan of dresses. She has a lot of summer sundress, but they all have "tank" tops. Here's an example. Are dresses like this acceptable at D41 or would she need to put a T-shirt underneath?
Posts: 482 | Location: Glen Ellyn, IL | Registered: February 26, 2007
Ah - the innocence of kindergarten. I remember last year when my freshman reported that in study hall a young man put a skirt-wearing "ho" (the young man's word) over his lap and spanked her. As it was told to me, "Mom, I'm not sure if she was wearing a thong, or didn't have any underwear on."
I would ask the school to clarify the kindergarten dress code.
Mamattorney - that style of dress is worn quite frequently by the younger kids. As Clamato states, when they get a bit older the t-shirt may be required. Your daughter should be fine.
This thread reminds of a conversation heard quite often around town...what do posters think about school uniforms in public elementary schools? Nothing too restrictive...polo-type shirts and denim or khaki jeans/pants or skirts/jumpers. Yeah or nay? Seems there are solid opinions on both sides of the question...
I would have no problem with uniforms either. Even through high school. My high school just had a dress code; it was skirts for the girls in all but the three coldest months of the year and ties for boys in all but the three hottest months of the school year. You wouldn't believe how many skirts I brought with me my freshman year of college that were never worn again. Fortunately for my niece and the others attending the school today, they have switched to the polo/khakis uniform so girls can spend their disposable income on more practical clothes.
Of course, having worn a uniform for 8 years, i can truthfully say while it cuts down on the garbage, it doesn't eliminate ALL the bull****. You wouldn't believe how important is was for me to have a certain brand of sweater and a certain kind of shoes -- the only two areas we were allowed any leeway with.
Posts: 482 | Location: Glen Ellyn, IL | Registered: February 26, 2007
I am opposed to uniforms in public schools. Dress code, absolutely! If you want your kids to wear uniforms, send them to private school but in my experience, as mama has alluded, the kids find ways to keep the BS in the whole "cool kid" "geeky kid" thing. Besides, I do think it's one way kids can help formulate their identity and test the waters of what is appropriate in various situations. Obviously, some parents need to reign in their kids a bit more and in some cases, the kid looks fine going out the door but looks completely different by the time he/she sets foot in the school.
Mama, your kindergarten girl will be just fine in that dress. It is meant more for girls once they start to "mature". However, depending on the classroom, some temperatures can be rather cool and so she may decide to wear a t-shirt underneath.
"The most valuable things in life are not measured in monetary terms. The really important things are not houses and lands, stocks and bonds, automobiles and real state, but friendships, trust, confidence, empathy, mercy, love and faith. " -Bertrand Russell V. Delong
Posts: 3305 | Location: Glen Ellyn, IL | Registered: April 04, 2003
Yeah, I can see where 'tank' would seem like a match to that dress. That is a spaghetti strap tank (?) but long. ?HMMM, I guess would the staff of the school or any school say or send a note home?
Beats what I've seen in Japan dress. Wow, those clothes are horrendously short. I watched the other day Babel and part of it is shot in Japan and I believe they are all uniformed children. The girls skirts were at the tops of the thighs. Even mid-length looks bad. My public school only allowed shorts, skirts or dresses to the knee. My private school was neutral and we didn't abuse it. It was never an issue with parents and kids. I was not Catholic.
I can tell you that the dress code was never a concern at the elementary level. In junior high it was and students were not sent home- they had to change into their gym uniform. At West it appears that they allow the students to wear anything they please. I am very glad that my girls are very modest.
Posts: 790 | Location: glen ellyn Illinois usa | Registered: April 05, 2003
Thanks everyone on the dress issue. I couldn't believe that it wouldn't be OK for a Kindergartener, but I wouldn't want her first day to involve a trip to the principal's office to change clothes.
I have to drop off her medical/dental/eye exam forms, so maybe I'll bring her along wearing one of her sundresses and just confirm with a member of the office staff.
Posts: 482 | Location: Glen Ellyn, IL | Registered: February 26, 2007
That dress totally fine through 5th grade, teachers in elemantary school dress that way. Over at Hadley, way different story, but now that the Fitch has left things could get relaxed.