|
|
· Message Board |
|
News · Calendars |
|
|
|||
Topic Closed|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
|
GlenEllynite |
I tell you, videogames and twinkies are to blame. We need to increase the PE budget! |
|||
|
|
GlenEllynite |
The difference in the number of kids in portables from this year to last is primarily a result of the usage of the portables at Churchill. Last year ( See January 2007 report here), you'll see 5 sections of 3rd grade in portables at Churchill. This year ( January 2008 report) there are 4 sections of 3rd and 4 sections of 4th in portables. Last year, those other portables that were not used for 3rd grade were used for bilingual and other special programs. The decision of how to utilize the portables is primarily made by the specific building administration. The fact that the "number of kids in portables" increased this year is not of particular concern to me personally, since I understand that the change is due to the "swap" at Churchill. Bob Solak |
|||
|
|
GlenEllynite |
The space utilization study was commissioned to only deal with utilization in regard to current programs. They were not tasked with suggesting program changes. I think the Board is aware of its limitations for projecting facility needs if you include changes to services delivered. Bob Solak |
|||
|
|
GlenEllynite |
Bob, as always, Thank You for your time and reply. My issue is how the Utilization "Facts" are provided to the community. If it is utlized to show overcrowding now (Not that it is) it only paints a half picture. This is one of the largest failings of previous Boards and Administrations. If the utilization study is used as a small part of an over-all master plan that takes into account possible program or class size target changes, than I am all for it. |
|||
|
|
GlenEllynite |
Readers can base their own conclusions from the report. But if the conclusion one draws is "overcrowding", then it is based upon the Personally, my desires for the report were to 1) see if there was any tweaking available to free up a classroom here and there (I didn't expect a silver bullet) and 2)provide a base of data for future analysis of facility options (including changes to programs, class sizes, etc.). [edit note: How did no one jump on me for using "preposition" like that? Fish, Dinsdale, where are you when the message board needs you?] This message has been edited. Last edited by: Bob Solak, Bob Solak |
|||
|
|
GlenEllynite |
Is the report linked somewhere? Or do we just get the summary and accompanying spin from the communications police?
Ronald M. Kas |
|||
|
|
GlenEllynite |
Well, I guess it was pretty much of a no-brainer, but you gotta appreciate Riebock sticking to the "600 kids in portables" mantra. What is that about repeating a lie often enough...? |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 2 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Topic Closed| Other Sub-Directories and Indices within the Glen Ellyn Web Site... | |||
| Cable, Broadband, DSL etc... | Photo Gallery... | Welcome & Site Info Page | |

