The comments posted on this message board represent the individual opinions of their respective posters only and are not to be construed as statements of proven or alleged fact.
His ride is over. Will be guilty in a majority of the counts, IMO. Going on the stand was a great idea. Though I don't think he had a choice in the matter.
Posts: 9128 | Location: CLEA | Registered: November 04, 2004
I guess my point is that George W admitted his pot and cocaine use as well. Are you equally opportunity offended, or just offended when it is someone with whom you do not agree?
No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. Albert Einstein
Oh. So not admitting means he didn't do it. And there is probably no possibility in your world that his father had his 1972 arrest expunged. No need to respond in defense - I don't think you will see this any other way so our debate would be pointless. I think the world is probably safer with you believing that about Bush anyway.
No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it. Albert Einstein
Admitting to pot and cocaine use these days is tantamount to admitting you had a martini. George Bush is no different than any other addict. Now that he is done with politics, he'd probably say the same thing. Once that bug is in ya, it don't come out. That all being said, who gives a **** about either dude's personal life?
How about that Blago verdict?
Posts: 9128 | Location: CLEA | Registered: November 04, 2004
Nor has anyone else about Bush. Nobody. It never happened.
Of course not. Every man who has held that office entered it without personal stain.
This quote leads me to wonder about weed: “I wouldn’t answer the marijuana questions. You know why? Because I don’t want some little kid doing what I tried.”
And he speaks repeatedly about his alcohol addiction. Hence, he is an addict. So what? Join the club. They are not rare, nor special. They are not all found on skid row. They are just like us. Except some of them make into the office of the POTUS. Would understanding that he is an addict make him less wonderful in your eyes?
Posts: 9128 | Location: CLEA | Registered: November 04, 2004
Thanks Yoss and Clam for bringing the thread back to where it belongs.
Is anyone else a little sick of the all-too-often used president v president hijack?
This thread is specifically about the Blago verdict....why do you people feel the need to turn it into something else? Oh wait, nevermind. I get it now.
Should I give up, or should I just keep chasing pavements....even if it leads nowhere - Adele