The comments posted on this message board represent the individual opinions of their respective posters only and are not to be construed as statements of proven or alleged fact.
Well, it has essentially nothing to do with Libertarianism. It's pretty much an attack on Republicanism, scattered with incorrect and or revisionist history (the Solid South, anyone?).
And we are a republic, I'm not sure why the author objects to that fact. Unless he's objecting to the "constitutional" adjective. I wouldn't see any problem with calling it either a "democratic republic" or a "constitutional republic". But it is a republic.
Posts: 1957 | Location: Posh YMCA District | Registered: June 04, 2003
