quote:

Interesting to note that the child in your article was the adopted child of teachers whose own mother was a homeless drug addict.

Also interesting to note that this was just one boy out of many noted in the article.

Jombl, your reasoning is the textbook version of smoke and mirrors

I'll respond right here:

"jombl, I do not have a problem with your facts. I have a HUGE problem with your attitude. Attacks, insults, and slander will not be tolerated. I don't care how much you think you are right, there is no excuse for an attack or calling someone a liar, twice. Andy is not a liar, his version of the facts simply do not agree with your version of the facts. Liar means intentional deceit, this is not the case. Figure out a more diplomatic way to make you point because next time will involve time-outs. You have been told."

From the moderator of the TDICLUB message board.
How many 'time-outs' have you received on that site???

Must have been pretty bad, since you had to change your screen name on that site.

So this is all about the politics of personal destruction is it? My attempt to correct you on your claim that I was "thrown off" a board was met with contempt and a spit in the face? It appears you've already figured out in the last few minutes that you were wrong - and rather than remove details about my personal life outside the GEBB you've chosen to twist it here.


This is the famous post in question, and yes I am still a member in good standing there, alwa6ys have been. The "mod" was, in the complete post that you edited from, remarking on an Amsoil salesman and my sparring with him over an arcane oil standard.

And, yes, I like many here, prefer not to have my back life drawn up too score cheap points in a local debate. Pardon me if I think less of you and your character for doing it.

This, by the way. is the specific statement that caused the trouble:

quote:

On the specific point you show as evidence a paid endorser claiming he was lying back in the day. So I'm left with trying to figure out if the paid celebrity endorser is lying now about having lied then.
The only thing I know with absolute certainty is that he's a liar.

It was directed at the celebrity endorser who made the claim that he lied about the product he was paid to use back in the day - he claimed he was always using the product he was now paid to endorse...my comment was about the endorser. It was mistaken by the moderator to be about a fellow member of the community there.


Any more black sheep in my closet there GEring that I need to prove myself to you about? Is there anything else in your little J. Edgar Hoover file on PADS enemies I should correct? Do all those in opposition to PADS have dossiers? Do they get passed around secretly?

You feel that you can instill fear into the residents of our village my posting something that is not true, and then turn around and call it 'grammer.'

You would not be so kind, sir, if someone came back to you with that if you pointed out their facts were false. You should change your post so that it reads truthfully and not as something that has occurred multiple times with multiple victims and multiple vagrant criminals.

I'll end with a direct quote from you, since it is a complete waste of my valuable time to debate anything with someone who is so hypocritical:

Don't say things that are not true and people won't feel the need to correct the record.

You tried to destroy me as a person here by posting lies, and outing things of a personal nature, about my life outside this board. When I tried to correct you privately, first directly by email and then by requesting you to respond to my email here you SPIT IN MY FACE.

Hardly an appropriate response, nor a neighborly one, to an error in grammar.

quote:

Hardly an appropriate response to an error in grammar.

It was a calculated error in grammar. Please stop with the appropriate response BS, it is making me laugh way too hard right now and my office staff are wondering what is so funny. Again, you are a trip.

Then your a sick vindictive sociopath to attack me as a person and violate my right to privacy over the use of plural vs singular. And think it's funny.

I also find it disgustingly obsessive that you should so fixate on me as to spend hours poring over years of my written word, and for what? A single grammar error, plural vs. singular?

yeah, it was really tough and took me hours to Google 'jombl.'

quote:

A single grammar error

A single calculated grammatical error.

You need help, I don't believe my error in grammar was posted, then you - knowing you could not just correct it - did a quick google search, that post you selected from years ago just popped up and bingo! you posted it in the next minutes.

Are you so weak and unable to discuss an item, or does your position have so little merit that you have no choice but to create a file on your "enemies"? Are you sick?

TDIclub? TDI owners have a forum that engage in this kind of nasty discussion? The mind boggles. I thought I had an addictive tendency with this Board, but a chat room for VW owners?

Look in the mirror and you'll see the one who needs the help.

quote:

You need help, I don't believe my error in grammar was posted,

Then why is it still there? You could change it if you really wanted to, fool.

Interesting that you wrote 'little girls', 'homes' and 'vagrants' and you want us to believe it was an 'error' on your part. That is pathetic to say the least.

quote:

Originally posted by GlenEllynRing:
Look in the mirror and you'll see the one who needs the help.

What, with grammar? I'm not the one obsessing about every written word of those I'm engaged in a debate with.

Or are you talking to R? Should I correct you by displaying those photos of you with the male hooker?

quote:

Should I correct you by displaying those photos of you with the male hooker?

Sorry, never been a fan of paying for sex, nor have I ever needed to.

quote:

Originally posted by GlenEllynRing:

quote:

You need help, I don't believe my error in grammar was posted,

Then why is it still there? You could change it if you really wanted to, fool.

It's probably still there because I've spent all my time responding to your relentless obsessiveness. I also doubt that anyone following the thread is unaware that the grammar has been questioned.

quote:

It's probably still there because I've spent all my time responding to your relentless obsessiveness.

You're a child.

He stays off of Jeep forums!

quote:

Originally posted by GlenEllynRing:

You're a child.

It was not I that found myself so unable to put forth my position that I dug into a persons background in a failed effort to discredit the messenger. It was not I that spent hours reading thousands of posts in an effort to discern something useful to attack a persons being with. It was not I that violated a neighbors right to privacy.

In short, all I have done is attempt to present, and support, my opinion. That I have on one occasion been vilified for using the plural instead of the singular is a fine testament.

Grammar is obviously a sensitive subject with you - but I am saddened to see that you feel the need to both gather and use material of a personal nature to further your personal politics.

I suggest a truce!